Is the Press Council of India and the Press Act in the country for social welfare? Or for the commercial benefit of corporate journalism and television? Make this clear.

September 12, 2024 • Makkal Adhikaram

Today, the situation in newspapers and television in the country has come to such an extent that people are criticizing it on YouTube. There is no point in the corporate media claiming to be neutral. A woman named Radha Devar who spoke about this on YouTube has explained it very clearly. People understand this too. The media understands this too. This matter is still not understood by the top officials of the news department. The Press Council of India does not understand.

How do you understand? Such media are commercially motivated. Circulation is a rule that the Press Act is deceiving the public. This journalism is deceiving the industry. This is what people’s power has been continuously revealing for six or seven years. It’s easy for these magazines to circulate. But social welfare is not here.

Without social welfare, how is the central and state governments spending crores of taxpayers’ money on them? How come the central and state governments are giving priority to these newspapers instead of giving priority to social welfare magazines? No one will discuss this. The Press Council of India has asked for some clarifications on the legal notice sent by us. This should be read.

That is, to eradicate corruption in the country, to solve the problems of the people in the society, there should be newspapers and televisions. But our question is that today’s corporate newspaper television channels are the ones that see the work of props up the corrupt and the rulers without pointing out the mistakes of the rulers, how is it justified to give crores of concessions and advertisements to this? Moreover, the Press Council of India has said that only the court has the power to change this wrong law. Can you change this?

Moreover, they are buying crores of government concessions and advertisements by showing circulation. So many people are reading private company advertisements, private business company advertisements, and they buy this too. That means they have income on both sides. If this corporate newspaper and television channel run this in terms of social welfare, will it be possible to show so much circulation?

Next, how much truth has this corporate magazine and television channels hidden the truth in what a woman political commentator can say? The media didn’t even reveal that. People’s Power has consistently expressed these messages in a neutral manner. If you want, you can read our website. No one can hide from this.

Moreover, people do not know that the incidents that have happened are being put up with some news and the neutral media is deceiving the people. But people like us understand that. Moreover, neutral political commentators like Radha Devar know. Here’s a clear explanation of this medium. In particular, he has broken some of the statements that no one said about the Mahavishnu incident in the school. I made this point clear in makkal adhikaram websites a few days ago.

It was wrong to arrest him. When Shankar and Mahavishnu spoke about the argument, it was a clash of opinions and he did not speak ill of the disabled people. Because he was the one who spoke ill of the disabled. The association comes and complains about the comment. Based on the complaint, a case is registered against Mahavishnu and the police arrest him. They were not at the scene of the incident. They have nothing to do with it.

However, he was arrested after filing a complaint at the police station. This law is actually a wrong law in the power given to the police. Whenever the police take such wrong steps, the law should be turned on them. It should not have to go to court and file a case for it and prove it.

Only then will the police not act as a handmaiden of the rulers or political parties. You have to take care of people’s welfare. Because you are getting your salary from the taxpayers’ money. You are not paid from the house of the rulers. Political parties did not pay salaries. The police need to understand this and act. Filing these false cases that have given power in their hands, it should be against the police.

Even today the Madras High Court has taken up a case as a sumotab. This is something to be very welcome. That is, if the parents of a victim come to the police station to lodge a complaint, they are beaten up. How big a cruelty? Where else would they go? And when you think that the law can’t do all this, the law favors the criminals.

This is what exacerbates the social problem. People’s lives increase the struggle. Such laws are a law to be discussed. In court, it is up to the judges to weed out the black laws of this police force in the interest of society. Similarly, it is for the judiciary to weed out these black laws in the press. Law should be like a blind eye to the scales in the hands of the Goddess of Justice.

It is a law in favour of the corporate press and against the social interest press. No one can explain these laws more clearly. To that extent, I have been informing the senior officials of the Central and State Governments through this news on behalf of makkal adhikaram . If you ignore this, you will have to answer in court.

Press Council of India First of all, what is journalism? Why journalism? Journalism for whom? What is its purpose? Knowing all this, the Circulation Act should have been enacted. The Circulation Act is a blind way for the corrupt and the politicians to cover up their mistakes and publicize their speeches. It does no good to society. If it is said that the press and television are fighting to eradicate corruption in politics, then these corporate media should give assurance to it.

That is, the corporate media is deceiving the journalism industry with this circulation law, just as people are deceived by the corrupt who are talking about corruption. It is the skill of corporate television to fool people. That efficient law is the Circulation Act, and that’s not all. All this skill is the court and these facts need to be looked at closely. If an impartial verdict is given later, this circulation black law in journalism can be broken.

Also, how clearly Radha Devar is mentioned in the TV debate. That is, a woman named Mathivathani is a speaker of Dravidian ideology and she is an atheist. What will he say? Like an omniscient genius, he has offended Hindu sentimentalists. He should have taken legal action against him for what he said. If he speaks in a way that hurts the beliefs of a religion, legal action can be taken against him. According to the police, it should have been on Mathivathani.

This is what these corporate TV newspapers in the country are constantly making such mistakes. It is the law for the strong to defeat the weak, if this is in the field of journalism, how can it not be with the common people? If atheists don’t believe in reincarnation or sin, you shouldn’t talk about it. People who have faith are talking. Life is a hope. Those are the beliefs people live by.

Which religion is not superstitious? Political commentator Radha Devar has clearly stated this. So, what is true for people now? Just look at what’s a lie. It doesn’t matter whether it’s big or small. The truth is that social welfare is important. It doesn’t matter that the minister has spoken, what did he say? What was he talking about? was that important? He spoke wrongly, spoke one-sidedly, spoke without knowing what is true and went away, today the problem is to what extent the Mahavishnu incident is being talked about by the people in Tamil Nadu.

People do not accept that leaders of political parties like Edappadi Palaniswami and Premalatha are doing politics by saying something superstitious and communal.