The Central and State Governments and officials are immediately arrested and imprisoned if they take bribes.
Even for a thousand, 500, 50,000, one lakh, the law immediately allows it. Is all this money? But, one lakh crore! 10,000 crore, 50 thousand crore, why am I not taking immediate action against ministers who have committed corruption of many crores like this?
Why are those who commit corruption to the extent of destabilizing the nation’s economy not immediately punished by law? Does the law immediately punish only the innocent and the common people?
Furthermore, why can’t the government and officials immediately seize their corrupt assets and ill-gotten wealth? Is there political interference in this? Or is it the law? Regarding which, no political party or individual has the qualification to speak to the people of the country in detail about this to date.
Furthermore, even political parties that claim to eradicate corruption have not discussed or spoken about this law so far. In a democracy, if there is one law for officials, another for the public, another for politicians, another for ministers, and so on, and they are deceiving the people with such laws, while the media lists how much they have plundered, and the people read it and cry out in shock, is this democracy?
Furthermore, why only for them the court? So much mercy? So many concessions? Minister because people voted! Otherwise, an ordinary person. Why this? Did Ambedkar, who drafted the law, not know? No. The people who lived in those times were honest, conscientious, and lived in fear of God. Even then, the Nehru dynasty forgot its conscience and committed unforgivable crimes, betraying India even then.
Furthermore, today’s political parties, by associating with anti-social elements, praising them as political parties, glorifying them, and seating them in positions of power, have deceived the people of Tamil Nadu for 50 years.
Furthermore, the people had to bear the consequences and punishment for seating an unqualified group, not them. However, the people of the country have suffered more from political corrupt individuals than from the atrocities they experienced during the British era.
Why has the law not been made stricter for them? Despite scientific corruption happening during the previous DMK Stalin regime, neither the central government nor the state government has taken action against those ministers. The state government’s arrests are merely nominal. Is this to comfort the people?
Furthermore, even if they had eaten a little, gone, and come back, it would have been understandable. They have accumulated assets worth many lakhs of crores. People like us who understand politics, the media, journalists, and social activists cannot accept all this.
Furthermore, how do their income accounts for these corruption accounts match up to this day? What business did he do? What business did his father do? What was their income before entering politics? What was their asset account? What is it after entering? How did several lakh crores come?
Why is the law that asks this question to an individual not asking it to them? Make the country its owner. Only then can corruption be eradicated. If an individual had done this, their assets would be confiscated and nationalized. Is there one law for them and another for common people?
Furthermore, is the court making a mistake here? Or is the law making a mistake? Who is complicit in this mistake? The officials? Or the court? Why was the judicial inquiry not conducted properly only with them?
Furthermore, Justice Cunha made Jayalalithaa, who was a Chief Minister, stand in the dock. She was not even given a chair to sit. The verdict was delivered while she was made to stand. He is a figure who will be remembered in the history of the judiciary. That is how it should be. It appears that the judiciary is making a mistake here.
Furthermore, when they come to court after committing corruption, they should not be seen as former ministers. Judges should see them as criminals. Only then will these criminals in the country receive proper punishment.
Not only that, cases against corrupt criminals should not take more than a year. Investigations and actions should be taken immediately. Whether it is a CBI case, an anti-corruption department case, an income tax department case, or an enforcement directorate case, if officials delay! Their promotions should be cut accordingly. This is where the mistake is happening.
Furthermore, on one hand, officials must show them leniency. On the other hand, the court must show them leniency. Not only that, how does the court accept the fake audit accounts they present? It is through these two ways that they are escaping.
There is law for corruption cases… but why is the verdict delayed for years?“Fake accounts! Suspicious audits! Reports, benami properties! Why a long investigation? — When will the actual properties be confiscated?
Furthermore, even though five thousand, ten thousand, which are not large sums, are useless, when there are such strict actions against government officials, why is there no immediate action against ministers, MLAs, and MPs who have committed scams worth lakhs of crores, despite the corruption law? This is why faith in the law has diminished.
Will Supreme Court Justice Surya Kant take action on this? Will this law be reviewed and amended? The question for Indian voters?
Share this post:
The Central and State Governments and officials are immediately arrested and imprisoned if they take bribes.
Even for a thousand, 500, 50,000, one lakh, the law immediately allows it. Is all this money? But, one lakh crore! 10,000 crore, 50 thousand crore, why am I not taking immediate action against ministers who have committed corruption of many crores like this?
Why are those who commit corruption to the extent of destabilizing the nation’s economy not immediately punished by law? Does the law immediately punish only the innocent and the common people?
Furthermore, why can’t the government and officials immediately seize their corrupt assets and ill-gotten wealth? Is there political interference in this? Or is it the law? Regarding which, no political party or individual has the qualification to speak to the people of the country in detail about this to date.
Furthermore, even political parties that claim to eradicate corruption have not discussed or spoken about this law so far. In a democracy, if there is one law for officials, another for the public, another for politicians, another for ministers, and so on, and they are deceiving the people with such laws, while the media lists how much they have plundered, and the people read it and cry out in shock, is this democracy?
Furthermore, why only for them the court? So much mercy? So many concessions? Minister because people voted! Otherwise, an ordinary person. Why this? Did Ambedkar, who drafted the law, not know? No. The people who lived in those times were honest, conscientious, and lived in fear of God. Even then, the Nehru dynasty forgot its conscience and committed unforgivable crimes, betraying India even then.
Furthermore, today’s political parties, by associating with anti-social elements, praising them as political parties, glorifying them, and seating them in positions of power, have deceived the people of Tamil Nadu for 50 years.
Furthermore, the people had to bear the consequences and punishment for seating an unqualified group, not them. However, the people of the country have suffered more from political corrupt individuals than from the atrocities they experienced during the British era.
Why has the law not been made stricter for them? Despite scientific corruption happening during the previous DMK Stalin regime, neither the central government nor the state government has taken action against those ministers. The state government’s arrests are merely nominal. Is this to comfort the people?
Furthermore, even if they had eaten a little, gone, and come back, it would have been understandable. They have accumulated assets worth many lakhs of crores. People like us who understand politics, the media, journalists, and social activists cannot accept all this.
Furthermore, how do their income accounts for these corruption accounts match up to this day? What business did he do? What business did his father do? What was their income before entering politics? What was their asset account? What is it after entering? How did several lakh crores come?
Why is the law that asks this question to an individual not asking it to them? Make the country its owner. Only then can corruption be eradicated. If an individual had done this, their assets would be confiscated and nationalized. Is there one law for them and another for common people?
Furthermore, is the court making a mistake here? Or is the law making a mistake? Who is complicit in this mistake? The officials? Or the court? Why was the judicial inquiry not conducted properly only with them?
Furthermore, Justice Cunha made Jayalalithaa, who was a Chief Minister, stand in the dock. She was not even given a chair to sit. The verdict was delivered while she was made to stand. He is a figure who will be remembered in the history of the judiciary. That is how it should be. It appears that the judiciary is making a mistake here.
Furthermore, when they come to court after committing corruption, they should not be seen as former ministers. Judges should see them as criminals. Only then will these criminals in the country receive proper punishment.
Not only that, cases against corrupt criminals should not take more than a year. Investigations and actions should be taken immediately. Whether it is a CBI case, an anti-corruption department case, an income tax department case, or an enforcement directorate case, if officials delay! Their promotions should be cut accordingly. This is where the mistake is happening.
Furthermore, on one hand, officials must show them leniency. On the other hand, the court must show them leniency. Not only that, how does the court accept the fake audit accounts they present? It is through these two ways that they are escaping.
There is law for corruption cases… but why is the verdict delayed for years?“Fake accounts! Suspicious audits! Reports, benami properties! Why a long investigation? — When will the actual properties be confiscated?
Furthermore, even though five thousand, ten thousand, which are not large sums, are useless, when there are such strict actions against government officials, why is there no immediate action against ministers, MLAs, and MPs who have committed scams worth lakhs of crores, despite the corruption law? This is why faith in the law has diminished.
Will Supreme Court Justice Surya Kant take action on this? Will this law be reviewed and amended? The question for Indian voters?